Banks v. Outlaw et al
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court dismiss the petition with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/8/09. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS E A S T E R N DIVISION E R I C J. BANKS R e g . #17473-045 V S. CASE NO.: 2:08CV00084 SWW/BD RESPONDENTS PETITIONER
T .C . OUTLAW W a r d e n , FCC, Forrest City, Arkansas, et al.
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections T h e following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District C o u rt Judge Susan Webber Wright. Any party may serve and file written objections to th is recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or le g a l basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify th a t finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of yo u r objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no la te r than eleven (11) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A c o p y will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. M a il your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C le rk , United States District Court E a s te rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325
B ackground Petitioner is currently serving a five year sentence in the Bureau of Prisons
(" B O P " ) after pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute fifty grams or more of m e th a m p h e ta m in e . (Docket entry #2 at p. 13) On March 17, 2008, the BOP notified P e titio n e r of his eligibility for its residential drug abuse program. At the same time, the B O P notified Petitioner that, according to its current assessment, he would not be eligible f o r early release upon completion of the program because his sentence was enhanced for h is possession of a firearm during the offense. (#2 at p. 18) On May 9, 2008, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U .S .C . § 2241 (#1) claiming he is entitled to be eligible for a reduction in his sentence u p o n completion of the residential drug abuse program. On July 3, 2008, the District C o u rt entered an order (#9) granting Petitioner's motion to stay his petition pending a d e c is io n by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in a similar case, Gatewood v. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843 (8th Cir. 2009). Petitioner moved to lift the stay after the Eighth Circuit re n d e re d its decision in Gatewood, and the District Court granted the motion. (#10, #11) In his motion to lift the stay, Petitioner again asks the Court to grant him eligibility f o r early release upon completion of the residential drug abuse program. The Eighth C irc u it's decision in Gatewood, however, precludes the Court from granting Petitioner th e requested relief. Id. at 844. In Gatewood, the Eighth Circuit rejected the petitioner's a rg u m e n t and held that 28 C.F.R. § 550.581 and BOP Program Statement 5162.04 are not
T h e relevant portion of 28 C.F.R. § 550.58 is now found at 28 C.F.R. § 550.55.
arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. In so holding, th e Eighth Circuit declined to follow the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' holding in A rr in g to n v. Daniels, 516 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008). III. C o n c lu s io n B a se d on the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Gatewood, the Court recommends that the D is tric t Court dismiss the petition with prejudice. D A T E D this 8th day of June, 2009.
___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?