Hinds v. Edwards et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 12 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing claims against deft Norris without prejudice. Service is appropriate for deft Edwards and the Clerk is directed to prepare a summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the or iginal complaint w/any attachments, a copy of pltf's objections to the Magistrate's proposed recommendations, a copy of the docket sheet, and a summons for deft through Humphries & Lewis Law firm, without prepayment of fees. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/26/08. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY M. HINDS ADC #650268 V. PETER EDWARDS, et al ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau. There have been no NO. 2:08cv00086 JMM-JWC DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF objections. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Norris are hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Plaintiff's case shall proceed against Defendant Edwards. Service is now appropriate for Defendant Edwards. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a summons for Defendant, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the original complaint with any attachments (doc. 3), a copy of Plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed recommendations (doc. 9), a copy of the docket sheet, and a summons for Defendant through Humphries and Lewis law firm, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, Arkansas 71612, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Should Defendant need copies of other filed documents, they are available from the Clerk's office or may be accessed through the PACER system for the United States District Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2008. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?