Quinones v. Outlaw et al
ORDER denying petitioner's 20 Objections to Report and Recommendations, which the Court deems a motion for reconsideration, for the reasons set forth in the Findings and Recommended Disposition. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/3/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION GUILLERMO QUINONES REG. #22965-004 VS. T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI Forrest City ORDE R On February 12, 2009 the Court entered an Order and Judgment adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray without objections. On the same day, Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time in which to file his objections. On February 17, 2009, the Court granted Petitioner's motion to file his objections. Petitioner has now filed his objections which the Court will treat as a motion for reconsideration as stated in the Court's previous order. After carefully considering Petitioner's objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition were appropriately approved and adopted. The Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is denied for the reasons set forth in the Findings and Recommended Disposition. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2009. 2:08CV00105 JMM/JTR PETITIONER
______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?