Kennedy v. Green et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Copies; denying 46 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/20/08. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION JEREMY KENNEDY ADC #93061 V. CHARLOTTE GREEN et al. ORDE R On October 17, 2008, Plaintiff filed a motion for copies (docket entry #45), and a motion to compel (docket entry #46). Plaintiff's motion for copies seeks a copy of all exhibits attached to his complaint, and a copy of everything filed by counsel for Defendant Charlotte Green. Plaintiff's motion will be granted with respect to the exhibits. However, according to Court records of this case, counsel for Green has only filed a notice of appearance and an answer, and Plaintiff has been sent a copy of both by the Court. If Plaintiff did not receive them, he may refile his motion at a later time. Plaintiff's motion to compel seeks a copy of his medical records, which is essentially the same issue in the motion he filed on September 15, 2008, and which was directed to Defendant Greg Harmon (docket entry #38). That motion was denied on October 15, 2008, after the Court concluded that Plaintiff's ability to review the records on request was sufficient (docket entry #43), and the Court sees no reason to revisit that decision at this time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's motion for copies (docket entry #45) is GRANTED IN PART AND NO: 2:08CV00115 JLH/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED with respect to his request for copies of the
exhibits attached to his complaint, and the Clerk is directed to forward to Plaintiff a copy of his complaint with attachments (docket entry #2). Plaintiff's motion is DENIED with respect to copies of all of the pleadings filed by Green's counsel. 2. Plaintiff's motion to compel (docket entry #46) is DENIED. 20 day of October, 2008.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?