Andrews v. Hunter et al
ORDER adopting 10 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, Pltf's complaint is DISMISSED W/PREJ for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; this dismissal counts as a "strike" purs to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/4/08. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION JULIUS ANDREWS REG #06075-025 V. KAREN HUNTER et al. ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 1. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim NO: 2:08CV00121 SWW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
upon which relief may be granted. 2. 3. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 4th day of September, 2008.
/s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?