Hester v. Norris et al

Filing 121

ORDER denying, without prejudice, 120 Application for Writ of Garnishment filed by Wesley Hester. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/27/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION WESLEY HESTER ADC #129029 VS. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:08CV00123 JMM LARRY NORRIS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER On May 8, 2009, Judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $10.00 for damages and $350.00 for costs in the above styled case. On June 24, 2009, Plaintiff filed an Application for a Writ of Execution which was granted on June 26, 2009 and Plaintiff was mailed a Writ of Execution form. On July 16, 2009, the Clerk of the Court was directed to complete the Writ of Execution form and to deliver the writ to the United States Marshal for service. On September 10, 2009, the Writ of Execution was returned executed as to Defendant and stated that the Marshal had made unsuccessful attempts to serve Defendant by mail and telephone. On August 30, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Re-Issuance of Writ which was granted. The Clerk of the Court prepared the writ and delivered it to the Marshal for execution on September 17, 2010. The writ was returned executed on May 16, 2011, with the notation that Plaintiff was unemployed and without any money. There was a notation that Plaintiff was expecting an income tax refund. Plaintiff has now filed a Writ of Garnishment but has failed to identify a third party who controls property of the defendant, e.g. Defendant’s bank or Defendant’s employer. Because the Court cannot issue a Writ of Garnishment until Plaintiff has provided the name and particulars of a third party who controls property of the defendant, Plaintiff’s Writ of Garnishment (#120) is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27 day of October , 2011. James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?