Wise v. Lappin et al

Filing 86

ORDER pursuant to the 80 Response filed by defendants and directing the Clerk to make amend the docket sheet to reflect the correct names of defts Matos, Shah, Cunningham, Phillips, Refender, Hamilton and Barron. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/21/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION TIMOTHY S. WISE, REG. # 03540063 V. CASE NO. 2:08CV00138 JMM/HDY PLAINTIFF HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons T. C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI - Forrest City DARYL MAUNE, Captain, FCI - Forrest City REGINALD WEEKS, Executive Assistant, FCI - Forrest City ROBBIE TAYLOR, Health Services Administrator, FCI - Forrest City GARY BOWERS, Associate Warden, FCI - Forrest City AMY CARLTON, Associate Warden, FCI - Forrest City HIPOLITO MATOS, (originally sued as MATOS), Medical Director, FCI - Forrest City ANGIE ROACH, Dentist, FCI - Forrest City NIHARIKA SHAH, (originally sued as SHAW, Mrs.), Health Services Administrator, FCI - Forrest City KARIN CUNNINGHAM, (originally sued as CUNNINGHAM, Mrs.) Nurse, FCI Forrest City SHERYL PHILLIPS, (originally sued as PHILLIPS, Mrs.), Nurse, FCI - Forrest City RUFO REFENDER, (originally sued as REFENDER), P.A., FCI - Forrest City IRIS HAMILTON, (originally sued as HAMILTON, Mrs.), Nurse, FCI - Forrest City DOES, Jane or John, Employees - FCI - Forrest City HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals G. MALDONADO, JR., Regional Director, B.O.P., South Central Region and HOWARD BARRON, (originally sued as BARRON), Unit Manager, FCI Forrest City ORDER DEFENDANTS Defendants have filed a Response (DE #80) which reflects the correct names of Defendants Matos, Shah, Cunningham, Phillips, Refender, Hamilton, and Barron. The Clerk of the Court is therefore directed to make these corrections on the docket and the Court's files and records. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2010. JAMES M. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?