Ivory v. Outlaw
ORDER GRANTING 14 Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/8/2009. (jas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION PATRICK O. IVORY Reg. #12205-042 V. T. C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI-Forrest City ORDER Pending is Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Without Prejudice (Doc. No. 14). Without objection, Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. On March 30, 2009, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 2) and a Brief in Support (Doc. No. 3) alleging he was entitled to 246 days of jail-time credit. Respondent filed a response on June 2, 2009 (Doc. No. 9), arguing that Petitioner's motion was meritless and that he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, which is a prerequisite to filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for relief. Respondent stated the failure to exhaust administrative remedies should lead to a dismissal of the Petitioner's § 2241 Petition. On September 2, 2009, Petitioner filed a Motion to Dismiss his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Without Prejudice (Doc. No. 14), acknowledging he had not fully exhausted all required administrative remedies before filing the instant § 2241 petition. 2:09-cv-00039-JJV RESPONDENT PETITIONER
Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2009.
____________________________________ JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?