Sandlin v. Humphrey et al
ORDER Adopting 151 Partial Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/4/10. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION CHRISTOPHER R. SANDLIN, ADC #136830 2:09CV00051JMM/HLJ MICHEAL T. HUMPHREY, et al. ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety.1 Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (DE #122) is GRANTED IN PART, with respect to defendants Henry Williams, Moses Jackson, Dennis Jackson, J.C. Andrews, Aundrea Weekly, Steven Outlaw, Greg Harmon, Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Larry Norris, James Gibson, Audrey Garrett, Trawanda Wright, Ronnie Hoskins, Edward Eaten, Faron Clemmons, Dennis McCoy, Terry Warren, M. Rogers, and Assistant Warden Ball. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED IN PART, without prejudice, with respect to defendants Micheal Humphrey, Seccer Cole, James Crumpton, Maurice Williams, and Benjamin Woodard. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 day of February, 2010. DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
__________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
These objections were filed by plaintiff pro se. However, he has been appointed counsel. Plaintiff is notified that from this date forward, the Court will only consider the pleadings filed by plaintiff's appointed counsel.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?