Pickens v. Jackson et al
Filing
247
ORDER ADOPTING 243 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 227 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' claims against defts Leslie Dover, Ray Hobbs, Greg Harmon, and Wendy Kelley are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/26/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL GLENN PICKENS,
ADC #91738
v.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 2:09CV00081 JLH
MOSES JACKSON, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering
the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART. Document #227.
2.
Defendants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims for monetary
damages against them in their official capacities, and all such claims are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
3.
Defendants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants
Leslie Dover, Ray Hobbs, Greg Harmon, and Wendy Kelley; all of Plaintiff’s personal capacity claims
against them are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the names of Dover, Hobbs, Harmon,
and Kelley are removed as party defendants.
4.
Defendants’ motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants
Moses Jackson, Marion Beard, and Jeremy Andrews, in their personal capacities.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2012.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?