Williams v. Whitfield et al
ORDER denying 266 Motion to Vacate ; denying 267 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/8/10. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS E A S T E R N DIVISION A L M. WILLIAMS #362773 V. CASE NO. 2:09CV00100 JLH/BD DEFENDANTS
L O N N I E WHITFIELD, et al.
ORDER P la in tif f has filed a motion to vacate and a motion to compel. (Docket entries # 2 6 6 and #267) Plaintiff's motions (#266 and #267) are DENIED. I. M o tio n to Vacate In Plaintiff's motion to vacate, he requests that the Court reconsider its order c o m p e llin g him to pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee. Plaintiff cannot avoid paying the f ilin g fee of his appeal in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion (#266) is DENIED. II. M o tio n to Compel In his motion to compel, Plaintiff requests the Court order Defendants Whitfield, R o b in so n , and Bell to produce a copy of his jail file and copies of the jail's security logs f ro m May 31, 2009 through June 30, 2009. (#267) Defendants have responded to P la in tif f 's motion, stating that they have previously explained that Plaintiff's jail file is lo s t and cannot be produced. They further argue that the request for security logs is o v e rly broad and not calculated to lead to admissible evidence. (#268) In addition, D e f e n d a n ts contend that Plaintiff's requests are duplicative.
Defendants' response has merit, and the motion (#267) is denied. However, D e f e n d a n ts are reminded that they must produce the lost jail file immediately, if it re a p p e a rs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2010.
____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?