Brown v. Avant et al
ORDER ADOPTING 119 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, separate defts' 96 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; pltf's claims against CMS are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; pltf's claims against defts B each, Cook, Hughes, and Thomas are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; pltf's 104 MOTION to Strike is DENIED; Correctional Medical Services Inc, Joseph Hughes, Anthony Thomas, Belinda Beach and Steven Cook terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/6/10. (vjt)
Brown v. Avant et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION BRANDON EVERETT BROWN ADC #142315 V. MARCO AVANT et al. ORDER NO: 2:09CV00133 SWW/HDY
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Belinda Beach, Steven Cook,
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Joseph Hughes, and Anthony Thomas (docket entry #96) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Correctional Medical Services, Inc., are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Belinda Beach, Steven Cook, Joseph Hughes, and Anthony Thomas, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and the names of Defendants Belinda Beach, Steven Cook, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Joseph Hughes, and Anthony Thomas, are removed as party Defendants. 2. Plaintiff's motion to strike (docket entry #104) is DENIED.
DATED this 6th day of October, 2010. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?