Tucker v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
Filing
392
ORDER adopting Judge Young's recommended disposition with one correction; and dismissing Tucker's complaint and amended complaints are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/22/11. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
RICHARD SCOTT TUCKER,
ADC # 122704
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:09-cv-151-DPM
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,
INC., CHARLOTTE GREEN, RICHARD PLANT,
DEBRA WEST, TERESA KUNDERT,
ROLAND ANDERSON,THEODORE DUENSING
and DIANNA LOCKLEAR
DEFENDANTS
Order
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's proposed
Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 384, and Richard Scott
Tucker's objections, Document Nos. 389, 390 & 391. After de novo review, the
Court adopts Judge Young's recommended disposition with one correction.
FED.R.Crv.P. 72(b)(3).The Court dismissed the claims against John Lytle in an
earlier order. Document No. 297. Tucker has failed to exhaust his
administrative remedy with respect to his various claims against all the other
Defendants before he filed this lawsuit. 42 U.s.C. § 1997e(a).
Tucker's complaint and amended complaints, Document Nos. 2, 29, 78,
79 & 303, are dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal counts as a "strike"
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal
from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good
faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3).
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. 11
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?