Cartwright v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to pltf's repeated failures to comply with the Court's Orders 4 10 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/2/10. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION TED M. CARTWRIGHT ADC #137787 v. No. 2:09CV00167 JLH/JTR DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al. ORDE R

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

due to Plaintiff's repeated failures to comply with the Court's Orders. See docket entries #4 and #10. 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2010.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE