Mills v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
ORDER ADOPTING 14 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, pltf is allowed to proceed in this lawsuit against defts Wallace, Barnes, and Lang, on his claims of that they denied him access to the courts; all of pltf's ot her claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and all other named defts are removed from this action; Bean, Brooks, Carter, Dean, Fought, Graham, Hill, Hopkins, Hughes, Ivory, McDowell, McNare, Larry Norris, Outlaw, Parker, Robinson, Taylor, Westbrook, Williams, Williams, Woodard, Allan and Arkansas Department of Correction terminated. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/6/10. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION BUCKIE A. MILLS ADC #105605 v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed in this lawsuit against Defendants Wallace, Barnes, NO: 2:09CV00171 JLH/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
and Lang, on his claims of that they denied him access to the courts. 2. All of Plaintiff's other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and all
other Defendants' names are removed as party Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?