Peete v. Outlaw
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court summarily dismiss 1 Lashun Peete's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Objections to R&R due no later than 14 days from the date the Recommended Disposition is received. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/22/10. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS E A S T E R N DIVISION L A S H U N PEETE, R e g # 18675-076 V S. NO. 2:10CV00008-BSM-BD PETITIONER
T .C . OUTLAW, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex, F o r r e st City, Arkansas
R ESPON D EN T
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections T h e following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District J u d g e Brian S. Miller. Any party may file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the o b je c tio n . If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the e v id e n c e that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must b e received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (1 4 ) days from the date you receive the Recommended Disposition. A copy will be f u rn is h e d to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of th e right to appeal questions of fact.
Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C le rk , United States District Court E a s te rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325 II. B a c k g r o u n d and Discussion O n January 19, 2010, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus (d o c k e t entry #1) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is serving an fifty-seven month s e n te n c e in the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") after pleading guilty to two counts of being a f e lo n in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). (#1 at p. 3) In his petition, Petitioner claims that under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e), he is eligible for a re d u c tio n in his sentence because he successfully completed a residential drug abuse p ro g ra m . (#1 at p. 6-7) Petitioner claims BOP regulations, which disqualify him from e a rly release because his underlying offense involved a firearm, violate the A d m in is tra tiv e Procedures Act. O n March 26, 2009, the Eighth Circuit decided a similar case, Gatewood v. O u tla w , 560 F.3d 843 (8th Cir. 2009). In Gatewood, as in this case, the habeas petitioner c la im e d BOP regulations disqualifying prisoners from early release after successful c o m p le tio n of a residential drug abuse program violate the Administrative Procedures A c t. The Court disagreed, however, and affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the h a b e a s petition. In doing so, the Court rejected the Ninth Circuit's analysis in Arrington v . Daniles, 516 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008) and held that the BOP's regulations do not v io la te the Administrative Procedures Act. Gatewood v. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843 (8th Cir.
2009). The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari and denied a petition for re h e a rin g in Gatewood. (#16) See Gatewood v. T.C. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843, cert. denied, 1 3 0 S.Ct. 490 (2009), petition for rehearing denied, 2010 WL 58841 (Jan. 11, 2010). In this petition, Petitioner asks the Court to grant him eligibility for early release b a s e d upon his completion of the BOP's residential drug abuse program. Petitioner c la im s the BOP's regulations denying him eligibility for early release violate the A d m in is tra tiv e Procedures Act. The Gatewood decision is dispositive. Petitioner pled g u ilty to an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) involving possession of a firearm. Under 28 C.F.R. § 550.55(b)(5)(ii) and BOP Program Statement 5162.05 1 , Petitioner is in e lig ib le for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e). Id. at 849. III. C o n c lu s io n F o r the reasons set forth above, the Court recommends that the District Court s u m m a rily dismiss Lashun Peete's petition for writ of habeas corpus (#1) with prejudice u n d e r Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.2 D A T E D this 22nd day of January, 2010.
____________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
T itle 28 C.F.R. § 550.55 became effective on March 16, 2009. On the same day, th e Bureau of Prisons issued Program Statement 5162.05 and rescinded Program S ta te m e n t 5162.04. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases is applicable to petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?