Hill v. Chapman et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 18 granting 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by defts and dismissing the complaint with prejudice; counting this dismissal as a "strike"; and certifying that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/29/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Hill v. Chapman et al Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION RONALD L. HILL REG. #15295-045 V. M. CHAPMAN et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (docket entry #11) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's NO: 2:10CV00015 JMM DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. 3. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. DATED this 29th day of July, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?