Williams v. Perry et al

Filing 95

ORDER ADOPTING 92 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/21/11. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
DAVID WILLIAMS.
ADC # 78730
Plaintiff,
v.
BRENDA PERRY, Grievance Officer, East
Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas
Department of Correction; ESSIE CLAY,
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas
Regional Unit, Arkansas Department of
Correction; and GREG HARMON, Warden,
East Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas
Department of Correction,
Defendants.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

No. 2:10-cv-00030-SWW-JJV

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 69) is GRANTED.

2.

Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order adopting the recommendation, and the accompanying Judgment, would not
be taken in good faith.
DATED this 21st day of April, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE