Williams v. Stewart et al

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING 56 Partial Report and Recommendations that 40 Motion for TRO filed by David Williams is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/27/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Williams v. Stewart et al Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION DAVID WILLIAMS ADC #78730 V. KATHY STEWART et al. ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. NO: 2:10CV00039 JMM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (docket entry #40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED to the extent that he should be allowed to keep and have access to the pleadings and exhibits in this case. 3. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED in all other respects. DATED this 27th day of September, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?