Carter v. Lams et al
ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; if Plaintiff wishes to continue with this action, he must, within thirty days of the entry of this Order; (a) pay the $350 filing fee in full; and (b) file a Motion to Reopen this case; the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3), that an ifp appeal from this order and the accompany Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/30/2010. (mkf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DANNY CARTER ADC #82560 V. 2:10CV00040 SWW/JTR DEFENDANTS
LAMS, Police Officer, Helena-West Helena Police; and JISSIE BLAKELY, Owner, Blakely Liquor Store ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. 2. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (docket entry #1) is DENIED. This § 1983 action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to the three
strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. If Plaintiff wishes to continue with this action, he must, within thirty days of the entry
of this Order: (a) pay the $350 filing fee in full; and (b) file a Motion to Reopen this case. 4. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 30th day of April, 2010. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?