Williams v. Stewart et al
ORDER granting 90 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 91 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 3/31/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DAVID WILLIAMS, ADC #78730 2:10-cv-00042-SWW-JTK KATHY STEWART ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motions to Amend and to Compel (Doc. Nos. 90, 91). In his Motion to Amend, Plaintiff asks to Amend his Response to Defendants' Motion for Order to Show Cause, filed on February 25, 2011. The Court will grant this request.1 In his Motion to Compel, Plaintiff asks the Court to order Defendants to permit him to keep all of his active cases in his cell property box. On September 24, 2010, the Court granted in part Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, and directed that Plaintiff be permitted to keep the pleadings and exhibits in this case in his cell property box (Doc. No. 56). Although Plaintiff continues to ask the Court to order Defendants to provide him access to all his cases, he does not indicate in his present Motion that Defendants have violated that Order with respect to documents associated with this particular case. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Response (Doc. No. 90) is GRANTED. DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
The Court denied Defendants' Motion for Order to Show Cause on March 24, 2011 (Doc. No. 92). 1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No, 91) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2011.
____________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?