Culclager v. Outlaw

Filing 4

ORDER directing the petitioner to file an application to proceed ifp or the $5.00 statutory filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order; and directing the Clerk to immediately forward to petitioner an ifp application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/23/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION LAKEITH CULCLAGER, REG. #25079-009 2:10CV00047JLH-JTK T.C. OUTLAW ORDER Petitioner has failed to file a Court approved Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that petitioner submit either the $5.00 statutory filing fee or an in forma pauperis application within thirty (30) days of the entry-date of this Order. Petitioner's failure to comply with this Order will result in a dismissal of this action without prejudice.1 The Clerk is hereby directed to immediately forward to petitioner an in forma pauperis application. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of April, 2010. RESPONDENT PETITIONER _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 The petitioner is hereby notified of his responsibility to comply with the Local Rules of the Court, including Rule 5.5(c)(2), which states: It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?