Williams v. McNary et al
ORDER adopting 83 Judge Young's Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing 2 Williams's complaint with prejudice; and denying as moot 87 Williams's motion to compel. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/23/11. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 2:10-cv-57-DPM
WALLACE McNARY, LORETTA
MICHAEL, MOSES JACKSON,
and GREG HARMON
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's
Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 83, and David
Williams's objections, Document Nos. 86, 88, & 89. After de novo review, the
Court adopts Judge Young's proposal as its own. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Williams's motion to compel, Document No.8 7, concerning access to his
legal work has already been addressed. The Court's November 2010 order
stated that "Williams's right to store court papers must be balanced against
ADC's fire and safety concerns, [and] he must decide which papers he wants
to keep inside his assigned footlocker." Document No. 43, at 2-3.
Williams's complaint, Document No.2, is dismissed with prejudice. And
Williams's motion to compel, Document No. 87, is denied as moot. The Court
certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment would
not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
~e .J.OI J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?