Guy v. Parkman et al

Filing 86

ORDER ADOPTING 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, defts' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 61 75 76 79 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/25/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION BENNIE DAVID GUY ADC #72720 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:10-cv-00066-SWW-JJV DAVE PARKMAN, Sheriff, St. Francis County; GLEN RAMSEY, Detective, St. Francis County Sheriff’s Department; STATE OF ARKANSAS; and DOES, St. Francis County Police Department and Forrest City Police Department DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 25th day of July, 2011. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?