Guy v. Parkman et al
ORDER ADOPTING 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, defts' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 61 75 76 79 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/25/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BENNIE DAVID GUY
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-00066-SWW-JJV
DAVE PARKMAN, Sheriff, St. Francis County;
GLEN RAMSEY, Detective, St. Francis County
Sheriff’s Department; STATE OF ARKANSAS;
and DOES, St. Francis County Police Department
and Forrest City Police Department
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62) is GRANTED and
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not
be taken in good faith.
DATED this 25th day of July, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?