Brown v. Outlaw
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of the petition and this Order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail; and directing t he respondent to file an answer within 20 days of service of the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/9/10. (bkp)
Brown v. Outlaw
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL ANTHONY BROWN, REG. #11513-021 2:10CV00081BSM-JTK T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI - Forrest City ORDER Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus (DE #1) and has paid the $5.00 statutory filing fee in full (DE #2). The Clerk of the Court will serve a copy of the petition and this Order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail. The respondent will file an answer, motion or other response to the petition, in conformity with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within twenty (20) days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service. The court directs the respondent to include in the response the following documents or information: 1. The judgment of conviction; 2. the docket sheet from the sentencing court evidencing the history of the proceedings; 3. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing a direct appeal by petitioner or affirming petitioner's conviction, or a citation to such order or opinion; 4. any order of the district court dismissing a § 2255 motion to vacate or § 2241 petition filed by petitioner; and RESPONDENT
5. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing an appeal by petitioner from the denial of § 2255 or §2241 relief or affirming the denial of a §2255 motion or § 2241 petition, or a citation to such order or opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2010.
________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?