Madden v. Fault et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 and denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lee Madden and denying all other pending motions as moot 3 4 ; directing plaintiff to submit the statutory filing fee of $350 within 10 days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case if he wishes to continue this case; and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/27/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Madden v. Fault et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION LEE MADDEN, ADC #136534 v. CPL. FAULT, et al. ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff Madden's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED, and all other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he shall submit the statutory filing fee of $350 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these Recommendations would not be taken in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2010. 2 : 1 0 C V 0 0 0 8 6 J M M / J TK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?