Murray v. Ford et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 and dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice; counting this dismissal as "strike"; and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/26/10. (bkp)

Murray v. Ford et al

Doc. 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ROLAND MURRAY, ADC #90500 v. CASE NO. 2:10CV00103 BSM/JTR DEFENDANT ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering the proposed findings and recommended disposition and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's complaint [Doc. No. 2] is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for PLAINTIFF

RODNEY FORD, Lieutenant, East Arkansas Regional Unit et al.

failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. 2. This dismissal shall count as a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 26th day of October, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com