Winnett v. Burls et al

Filing 42

ORDER directing the Clerk to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of deft Walter Holloway and to prepare summons for deft Holloway. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint, this order, and summons upon deft Holloway without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/27/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
-HDY Winnett v. Burls et al Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION DONALD WINNETT ADC #139544 V. DANNY BURLS et al. ORDE R Plaintiff filed this complaint on July 26, 2010, and service was ordered. On October 26, 2010, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendant Holloway (docket entry #38). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of Correction, but a note accompanying the return indicates that Holloway, whose first name of Walter was provided, is not employed there, but may be an employee of the prison's medical contractor. Accordingly, service on Holloway will be attempted in the care of counsel for the medical contractor. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of NO: 2:10CV00106 DPM/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF Defendant Walter Holloway. 2. Service is appropriate on Defendant Holloway, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint (docket entry #2), this order, and summons, upon him, in the care of counsel for the prison's medical contractor, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 day of October, 2010. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?