Hill v. Burl et al

Filing 151

ORDER ADOPTING 148 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Mr. Holloway's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 115 is GRANTED; ADC Defts' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 117 is GRANTED; pltf's complaint is D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies; Mr. Holloway's request that this dismissal be counted as a "strike" is DENIED; all pending motions are rendered MOOT. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/22/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TRAVIS J. HILL, * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. DANNY BURL, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-00120-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Holloway’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 115) is GRANTED. 2. ADC Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 117) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. 4. Mr. Holloway’s request that this dismissal be counted as a “strike” is DENIED. 5. All pending motions are rendered MOOT. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2011. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?