Obama v. Burl et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; the dismissal of this action constitutes as "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/15/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Obama v. Burl et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ISHMAEL HASSAN OBAMA a/k/a Steven Donnelle Cody ADC #145160 V. DANNY BURL, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, et al. ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. 1915A, this case is 2:10CV00126 SWW/JTR DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. 1915(g). 3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma The dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES as "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 15th day of October, 2010. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?