Lewis et al v. Outlaw et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING 13 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting 8 Motion to Dismiss Party filed by Derrick Denton. Denton's name shall be removed as a party plaintiff. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed solely on his claim that defts Willoug hby, Norman, Zewenski and T.C. Outlaw are subjecting him to a dangerous living environment. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice and the names of all individuals except for the above-named defts are removed as party defts. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/24/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
-HDY Lewis et al v. Outlaw et al Doc. 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION HERBERT LEWIS et al. Reg. #08740-043 v. CASE NO. 2:10CV00131 BSM/HDY PLAINTIFFS T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI - Forrest City et al. ORDER DEFENDANTS The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the filed objections have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Derrick Denton's motion to voluntarily dismiss his claims without prejudice [Doc. No. 8] is GRANTED, and Denton's name shall be removed as a party plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff Herbert Lewis is allowed to proceed solely on his claim that Defendants Willoughby, Norman, Zewenski, and T.C. Outlaw, are subjecting him to a dangerous living environment, Lewis's other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the names of all individuals except for Defendants Willoughby, Norman, Zewenski, and T.C. Outlaw, are removed Dockets.Justia.com as party defendants. Dated this 24th day of March, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?