Reed v. Does

Filing 40

ORDER adopting 38 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/7/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION MALICH REED REG. #28371-177 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 2:10CV00159 SWW/HDY JOHN DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #20) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claims, and all such claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit. 3. Defendants’ motion is DENIED with respect to his excessive force claims. DATED this 7th day of July 2011. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?