Reed v. Does
ORDER denying pltf's 43 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/25/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NO: 2:10CV00159 SWW/HDY
By Order entered July 7, 2011 [doc.#40], the Court, noting that no objections have been
filed, adopted in full Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition [doc.#38] submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young that (1) granted Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claims and dismissing all
such claims without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior
to filing this lawsuit, and (2) denied Defendants’ motion with respect to Plaintiff’s excessive force
On July 11, 2011, the Court received Plaintiff’s undated and belated objection [doc.#42] to
the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Thereafter, the Court received what
has been docketed as Plaintiff’s motion [doc.#43] for reconsideration. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s
objection and motion for reconsideration, the Court finds no basis for reconsidering its adoption in
full of the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition [doc.#38]. Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s motion [doc.#43] for reconsideration is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of July 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?