Reed v. Does

Filing 44

ORDER denying pltf's 43 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/25/11. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
MALICH REED
REG. #28371-177
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 2:10CV00159 SWW/HDY

JOHN DOES

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

By Order entered July 7, 2011 [doc.#40], the Court, noting that no objections have been
filed, adopted in full Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition [doc.#38] submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young that (1) granted Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claims and dismissing all
such claims without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior
to filing this lawsuit, and (2) denied Defendants’ motion with respect to Plaintiff’s excessive force
claims.
On July 11, 2011, the Court received Plaintiff’s undated and belated objection [doc.#42] to
the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Thereafter, the Court received what
has been docketed as Plaintiff’s motion [doc.#43] for reconsideration. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s
objection and motion for reconsideration, the Court finds no basis for reconsidering its adoption in
full of the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition [doc.#38]. Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s motion [doc.#43] for reconsideration is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of July 2011.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE