Poe v. Polaris Industries Inc et al

Filing 82

ORDER directing counsel for the parties to meet and confer by telephone this week to address the Whittle issue. Poe's three responses are due May 6, 2013. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/30/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CHRIS POE v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:11-cv-39-DPM POLARIS INDUSTRIES INC.; and FLOYD INC., d/b/a Sunrise Yamaha Motor Sports DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court needs an expedited response to Polaris’s three motions to strike, № 79, 80 & 81. On Smith and Breen, the record issues need settling so the Court can finish deciding the motions to exclude. On Whittle, the issue is different. Polaris’s motion to strike the designations of his deposition testimony for trial is contrary to the Court’s Scheduling Order, № 44 at 3, but so too has been Poe’s untimeliness. The Court directs counsel to meet and confer by telephone this week to address the Whittle issue. Poe should report the fruit of this meeting in his response to the Whittle motion. Poe’s three responses due 6 May 2013. So Ordered. ________________________ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 30 April 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?