Poe v. Polaris Industries Inc et al
Filing
82
ORDER directing counsel for the parties to meet and confer by telephone this week to address the Whittle issue. Poe's three responses are due May 6, 2013. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/30/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRIS POE
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:11-cv-39-DPM
POLARIS INDUSTRIES INC.; and FLOYD INC.,
d/b/a Sunrise Yamaha Motor Sports
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court needs an expedited response to Polaris’s three motions to
strike, № 79, 80 & 81. On Smith and Breen, the record issues need settling so
the Court can finish deciding the motions to exclude. On Whittle, the issue is
different.
Polaris’s motion to strike the designations of his deposition
testimony for trial is contrary to the Court’s Scheduling Order, № 44 at 3, but
so too has been Poe’s untimeliness. The Court directs counsel to meet and
confer by telephone this week to address the Whittle issue. Poe should report
the fruit of this meeting in his response to the Whittle motion. Poe’s three
responses due 6 May 2013.
So Ordered.
________________________
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
30 April 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?