Champion v. Akin et al
ORDER approving and adopting 64 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting 49 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Defendants Ball and Burl without prejudice; and , dismissing the inadequate medical care claim Plaintiff has raised against Defendant Akin with prejudice. Defendants have thirty days from the entry of this Order to file any further dispositive motions. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/10/2012. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DANNY BURL, Warden,
East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed
objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review
of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (docket entry #49)
Defendants Ball and Burl are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
because Plaintiff failed to timely and properly exhaust his administrative remedies
The inadequate medical care claim Plaintiff has raised against Defendant
Akin, in her official capacity, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff may PROCEED with his inadequate medical care claim against
Defendant Akin, in her individual capacity, for monetary damages only.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #58) is
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Defendants have thirty days from the entry of this Order to file any
further dispositive motions.
day of February , 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?