Conrad v. Outlaw
ORDER directing the Clerk to serve a copy of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mario M Conrad, 2 Brief in Support, and this Order on Respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail; Respondent shall file a response to the petition within 21 days after service. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/10/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MARIO M. CONRAD
Warden, FCI-Forrest City
Petitioner Mario M. Conrad has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1),
along with a brief in support (docket entry #2), and has paid the $5.00 filing fee.
The clerk will serve a copy of the petition, brief in support, and this order, on the respondent
and the United States Attorney by regular mail.
The respondent will file an answer, motion or other response to the petition, in conformity
with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within
twenty-one (21) days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service.
The Court directs the respondent to include in the response the following documents or
1. The judgment of conviction;
2. the docket sheet from the sentencing court evidencing the history
of the proceedings;
3. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing a direct
appeal by petitioner or affirming petitioner’s conviction, or a citation
to such order or opinion;
4. any order of the district court dismissing a § 2255 motion to vacate
or § 2241 petition filed by petitioner; and
5. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing an
appeal by petitioner from the denial of § 2255 or §2241 relief or
affirming the denial of a §2255 motion or § 2241 petition, or a
citation to such order or opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10
day of May, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?