Hicks v. Kelley et al
ORDER directing pltf to submit, no later than 30 days after the entry of this Order, either the full $350 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application (enclosed), and file it. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/15/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NO: 2:11CV00085 JMM/HDY
WENDY KELLEY et al.
Plaintiff Anthony Hicks, a former inmate who was incarcerated at the Arkansas Department
of Correction’s East Arkansas Regional Unit, filed this pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983, on April 28, 2011, and he was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (docket entry #4). However, on August 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of
a change of address which indicates that he has been released from custody (docket entry #44).
When a plaintiff is released from confinement, the Court’s policy is to require re-submission
of affidavits to determine whether he should be required to pay all, or a portion of, the fees and costs
of the lawsuit. Accordingly, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he is directed to, no
later than 30 days after the entry of this order, resubmit an IFP application which reflects his freeworld financial status, or to pay the full $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in
the recommended dismissal of this action, without prejudice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
The Clerk is directed to forward an IFP application to Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is directed to submit, no later than 30 days after the entry of this order, either
the full $350.00 statutory filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it.
Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint.
day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?