Luttrell v. Outlaw

Filing 61

ORDER adopting 40 Judge Deere's Partial Recommended Disposition; denying 9 , 10 , 13 , 18 , and 33 Motions; and, directing the Clerk to file 17 Luttrell's objection, as his amended complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/2011. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHARLES RAY LUTTRELL,

Reg #22154-045

v.

PLAINTIFF

No.2:11-cv-97-DPM-BD

T.C. OUTLAW, Warden

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Partial
Recommended Disposition, Document No. 40, and Luttrell's objections,
Document No. 47. On de novo review, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3), the Court adopts

Judge Deere's recommendation with two additional observations. First,
notwithstanding the information in Luttrell's additional filings, he has not
shown irreparable harm in his current circumstances: for example, he has
gotten medication for his stomach problems and been seen by a
gastroenterologist. Document No. 49, at 2. Second, Luttrell has not made a
sufficient showing about likely future harm resulting from unremedied
current conditions to justify the extraordinary step of injunctive relief. Helling
v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 32-35 (1993); Larson v. Kempker, 414 F.3d 936, 940 (8th

Cir.2005).
Judge Deere's Partial Recommended Disposition, Document No. 40, is
adopted as supplemented. Motions, Document Nos. 9, 10, 13, 18 & 33, denied.
The Clerk is directed to file Luttrell's objection, Document No. 17, as his
amended complaint.
So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
12 October 2011

-2­