Conery/Malik v. Jackson et al
ORDER directing plaintiff to file a response to deft's 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment within ten days of the date of this Order or risk dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/24/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MOSES JACKSON, III, et al.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ester’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 21). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Motion. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to this
Court's Order may result in the dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiff's Complaint for failure
to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2012.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?