Conery/Malik v. Jackson et al

Filing 24

ORDER directing plaintiff to file a response to deft's 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment within ten days of the date of this Order or risk dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/24/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION MARCUS CONERY/MALIK, ADC #100469 v. PLAINTIFF 2:11-cv-00123-BSM-JTK MOSES JACKSON, III, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ester’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 21). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Motion. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to this Court's Order may result in the dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2012. ____________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?