Luttrell v. Outlaw
ORDER directing the Clerk to serve a copy of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Ray Luttrell, 5 Brief in Support, and this Order on Respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail; Respondent shall file a response to the habeas petition within 21 days after service. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/23/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHARLES RAY LUTTRELL
Warden, FCI–Forrest City
Petitioner Charles Ray Luttrell, currently held at the Federal Correctional Institution in
Forrest City, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1), and has paid the $5.00
filing fee (docket entry #6).
The clerk will serve a copy of the petition, and this order, on the respondent and the United
States Attorney by regular mail.
The respondent will file an answer, motion or other response to the petition, in conformity
with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within
twenty-one (21) days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service.
The Court directs the respondent to include in the response the following documents or
1. The judgment of conviction;
2. the docket sheet from the sentencing court evidencing the history
of the proceedings;
3. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing a direct
appeal by petitioner or affirming petitioner’s conviction, or a citation
to such order or opinion;
4. any order of the district court dismissing a § 2255 motion to vacate
or § 2241 petition filed by petitioner; and
5. any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing an appeal by petitioner
from the denial of § 2255 or §2241 relief or affirming the denial of a §2255 motion
or § 2241 petition, or a citation to such order or opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23
day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?