James v. Ball et al
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING 64 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 48 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing all of James' claims against defendants Stell and Corizon, Inc., without prejudice; dismissing, without prejudice, James' claim that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate medical care for tinnitus; dismissing, with prejudice, James' claims that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate medical care for his port-a-cath and neck/peripheral pain. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/5/2012. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
DONNIE B. JAMES
ADC #089050
V.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 2:11CV00161 BSM
DR. DON BALL,
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections have been reviewed. After
carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this
case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 48] is granted.
2.
All of James’s claims against defendants Stell and Corizon, Inc. are dismissed
without prejudice.
3.
James’s claim that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate
medical care for tinnitus is dismissed without prejudice.
4.
James’s claims that defendants Butler and Ball provided him with inadequate
medical care for his port-a-cath and neck/peripheral pain are dismissed with prejudice.
5.
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
An appropriate judgment will accompany this order.
DATED this 5th day of December 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?