Parks v. Correctional Medical Services
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by deft Corizon Inc is GRANTED, and pltf's claims against Corizon Inc are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; pltf's 11 Motion to Amend is GRANTED; the Clerk is directed to file entry 11-1 as pltf's amended complaint, and to add as defts Jones and Doe; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaints 2 11 , and this Order on deft Jones without prepayment of fees and costs; Corizon Inc terminated. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/10/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DEREK MAURICE PARKS, SR.
NO. 2:11CV00199 JLH/HDY
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
The motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Corizon Inc. is GRANTED (docket entry
#6), Plaintiff’s claims against Corizon Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the name of
Corizon Inc. is removed as a party Defendant.
Plaintiff’s motion to amend (docket entry #11) is GRANTED, and the Clerk is
directed to file docket entry #11-1 as Plaintiff’s amended complaint, and to add as Defendants Jones
Service is appropriate for Defendant Jones, and the United States Marshal is directed
to serve a copy of the complaint (docket entry #2), amended complaint (docket entry #11-1), this
order, and summons, upon Jones, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.
DATED this 10th day of January, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?