Chatman v. Burl et al
ORDER ADOPTING 55 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, the motions for summary judgment 33 49 filed by separate defts are GRANTED and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; pltf's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/11/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ANTHONY RAY CHATMAN,
No. 2:11CV00216 JLH-JTK
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment filed by
defendants Strickland, Ball, and Corizon, Inc. (Doc. Nos. 33, 49), are GRANTED and plaintiff’s
complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 44)
is DENIED as moot.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September, 2012.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?