Williams v. Gray et al

Filing 5

ORDER approving and adopting 2 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, and dismissing 1 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/14/2011. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION THELMA WILLIAMS JR., ADC # 93197 v. PLAINTIFF 2:11-cv-00217-JMM-JJV JANICE F. GRAY, Law Library Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the three-strikes rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 2. If Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he must submit within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order: (a) the statutory filing fee of $350, in full, to the Clerk, noting the case style and number; and (b) file a motion to reopen the case. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 14th day of December, 2011. JAMES M. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?