Robertson v. Andrews et al
ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this action is dismissed with prejudice, and the dismissal counts as a "strike"; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/26/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MICHAEL ROBERTSON, ADC #115658
CASE NO. 2:11CV00231 BSM
JEREMY ANDREWS et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 14] submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the filed objections have been
reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the
record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
It is, therefore, ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice, and that the
dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is further certified,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26h day of June 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?