Jeffers et al v. Beebe et al

Filing 89

ORDER denying pltfs' 86 Motion to Enjoin the Certification of the Election Results in State Senate District 24. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/29/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION FUTURE MAE JEFFERS; MARY JEFFERS; HENRY PEACOCK; SHIRLEY HARVELL; REV. RONALD WILLIAMS; PEGGY R. WRIGHT; LAURA LOVE; FRANK SHAW; C.W. CAMPBELL; LEO CHITMAN; ETTA CAMPBELL; PLEZ LUCAS; VICKIE ROBERTSON; JOSEPH PERRY; ELBERT SMITH; SANDRA BAGLEY; NIKKI DISMUKE; ALICE W. VALLEY; LAKETHA BROWN FLUKER; KATRINA HARRELL; CHESTER HARRELL; EDDIE O’NEAL; CHRISTOPHER FRANKLIN; and JACK BERNARD CRUMBLY v. PLAINTIFFS No. 2:12CV00016 JLH MIKE BEEBE, in his capacity as Governor of Arkansas and Chairman of the Arkansas Board of Apportionment; MARK MARTIN, in his capacity as Secretary of State of Arkansas and as a member of the Arkansas Board of Apportionment; DUSTIN MCDANIEL, in his capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas and a member of the Arkansas Board of Apportionment; and ARKANSAS BOARD OF APPORTIONMENT DEFENDANTS Before Three Judge Panel District Judge Holmes, Circuit Judge Smith, and District Judge Wright ORDER The plaintiffs have filed a motion to enjoin the certification of the election results in state Senate District 24. That motion is, in substance, a repetition of the motion made at the close of trial requesting the Court to enjoin the primary election for Senate District 24, as well as Senate Districts 22 and 23. For the reasons stated by the Court in the Order entered on May 11, 2012, the motion to enjoin the certification of the election results in state Senate District 24 is denied. Document #86. I am authorized to state that Circuit Judge Lavenski R. Smith and District Judge Susan Webber Wright join in this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of May, 2012. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?