Jeffers et al v. Beebe et al

Filing 94

JUDGMENT Before Three Judge Panel District Judge Holmes, Circuit Judge Smith, and District Judge Wright, pursuant to 93 Opinion entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendants, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lavenski R. Smith on 9/17/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
FUTURE MAE JEFFERS; MARY JEFFERS;
HENRY PEACOCK; SHIRLEY HARVELL;
REV. RONALD WILLIAMS; PEGGY R. WRIGHT;
LAURA LOVE; FRANK SHAW; C.W. CAMPBELL;
LEO CHITMAN; ETTA CAMPBELL; PLEZ LUCAS;
VICKIE ROBERTSON; JOSEPH PERRY; ELBERT SMITH;
SANDRA BAGLEY; NIKKI DISMUKE; ALICE W. VALLEY;
LAKETHA BROWN FLUKER; KATRINA HARRELL;
CHESTER HARRELL; EDDIE O'NEAL; CHRISTOPHER
FRANKLIN; and JACK BERNARD CRUMBLY

PLAINTIFFS

SEP 17 2012
JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK

By:

6!

;:UI'Wn..k
DcP CLERK

No. 2:12CV00016 JLH

v.

MIKE BEEBE, in his capacity as Governor of Arkansas
and Chairman of the Arkansas Board of Apportionment;
MARK MARTIN, in his capacity as Secretary of State
of Arkansas and as a member of the Arkansas Board
of Apportionment; DUSTIN MCDANIEL, in his
capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas and a member
of the Arkansas Board of Apportionment; and
ARKANSAS BOARD OF APPORTIONMENT

DEFENDANTS

Before Three Judge Panel
District Judge Holmes, Circuit Judge Smith, and District Judge Wright
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the opinion entered separately today, judgment is entered in favor of the
defendants. The plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this

/?~

day of September, 2012.

~·
~KlR.SMITH
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

~WE~