Norris v. May et al

Filing 27

ORDER denying pltf's 21 Motion to Compel; however, defts should respond to all of pltf's discovery requests pursuant to the FRCP. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/31/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
FREDRICK NORRIS
ADC #095167
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 2:12CV00041 KGB/HDY

LARRY MAY et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his requests for production
of documents. Defendants filed a response in opposition (docket entry #25), noting that Plaintiff’s
requests were filed on July 13, 2012 (docket entry #22), and the response time for those requests has
not yet run. Defendants also note that an earlier discovery request was filed before the complaint
had been served on them (docket entry #4), and that the requests were not properly served on them.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (docket entry #21) is DENIED. However, Defendants should
respond to all of Plaintiff’s discovery requests pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31

day of July, 2012.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE