Norris v. May et al

Filing 27

ORDER denying pltf's 21 Motion to Compel; however, defts should respond to all of pltf's discovery requests pursuant to the FRCP. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/31/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION FREDRICK NORRIS ADC #095167 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 2:12CV00041 KGB/HDY LARRY MAY et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his requests for production of documents. Defendants filed a response in opposition (docket entry #25), noting that Plaintiff’s requests were filed on July 13, 2012 (docket entry #22), and the response time for those requests has not yet run. Defendants also note that an earlier discovery request was filed before the complaint had been served on them (docket entry #4), and that the requests were not properly served on them. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (docket entry #21) is DENIED. However, Defendants should respond to all of Plaintiff’s discovery requests pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31 day of July, 2012. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?