Norris v. May et al
Filing
74
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 70 and dismissing the 2 Complaint filed by Fredrick Norris with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/15/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
FREDRICK NORRIS
ADC #095167
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:12-cv-00041 KGB
LARRY MAY, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 70) and the objections filed by Mr.
Norris (Dkt. No. 71). After carefully considering Mr. Norris’s objections and making a de novo
review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as
this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to introduce sufficient
evidence to create a fact issue to be submitted to a jury.
2.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2013.
_______________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?