Hooper v. Corizon Inc et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; dismissing Defendants Gordon, Hughes, and Corizon without prejudice; and giving Plaintiff 90 days to file an amended complaint containing the names of and the service addresses for the Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/11/12. (hph)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
DANNY LEE HOOPER,
ADC #107609
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 2:12CV00047 BSM/JTR

CORIZON, INC., et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After
carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants Gordon, Hughes, and Corizon be DISMISSED, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, because plaintiff has failed to state a claim against them.
2.

Plaintiff be given 90 days to file an amended complaint containing the names

of and the service addresses for the Doe defendants.
3.

It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 11th day of June 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE