Hooper v. Corizon Inc et al
ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; dismissing Defendants Gordon, Hughes, and Corizon without prejudice; and giving Plaintiff 90 days to file an amended complaint containing the names of and the service addresses for the Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/11/12. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DANNY LEE HOOPER,
CASE NO. 2:12CV00047 BSM/JTR
CORIZON, INC., et al.
The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After
carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Defendants Gordon, Hughes, and Corizon be DISMISSED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, because plaintiff has failed to state a claim against them.
Plaintiff be given 90 days to file an amended complaint containing the names
of and the service addresses for the Doe defendants.
It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 11th day of June 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?